For example, if a person is a vegetarian, is firmly committed to the principle that eating meat is wrong, works to educate others about the dangers and ethics involved with eating meat, and hopes for a future in which meat is no longer eaten, then it might not be unreasonable to describe this person as having a religious commitment to the principles and ethics of vegetarianism.
Photo provided by Flickr
Some critics might cite the admission of a moral penumbra as a defeater for ER (or any form of moral objectivity) with an assistance requirement. However, just as the existence of a physical penumbra does not preclude the existence of physical objectivity, so too the existence of a moral penumbra does not preclude the existence of moral objectivity.
Morality, Religion and Experimenting on You | HuffPost
Photo provided by Flickr
Many theists believe that only the existence of a suitably powerful, morally perfect supernatural being can provide a proper objective foundation for ethical behavior. And because there is in fact such a foundation, they argue, we have a powerful argument for the existence of God (and thus for the falsity of atheism). With Fyodor Dostoyevsky, they believe that if God does not exist, then everything is permitted—i.e., without the existence of God, there can be no objective morality. This belief helps explain a number of (sometimes disturbing) facts about contemporary American society. For example, polls consistently show that Americans hold atheists in lower esteem than they do members of any other major social group. In addition, unsurprisingly, it is virtually impossible for an avowed atheist to win election to any American public office. In fact, in some states, such as Texas, it is not even constitutionally permitted for an atheist to hold public office. Religionists are firmly convinced that an objective ethics works in their favor. This paper will challenge that contention.
or even that morality cannot exist without religion.
In any case, religiosity is only loosely related to theology. That is, the beliefs and behaviors of religious people are not always in accordance with official religious doctrines. Instead, popular religiosity tends to be much more practical and intuitive. This is what religious studies scholars call
camz / John Arthur: Religion, Morality, and Conscience
Moreover, religious ideals of moral behavior are often limited to group members and might even be accompanied by outright hatred against other groups. In 1543, for example, Martin Luther, one of the fathers of Protestantism, published a titled “On the Jews and their Lies,” echoing anti-Semitic sentiments that have been common among various religious groups for centuries.
Morality and Religion - IslamiCity
This finding has now been confirmed in numerous laboratory and field studies. Overall, the results are clear: No matter how we define morality, religious people do more morally than atheists, although they often say () that they do.
Can Morality Exist Without Religion? - Religion (2) - …
Religious dogma belies any claim that belief in God leads toa more moral society. The dogma of sin is so petty, arbitrary and undefined, asto be meaningless. For a God father or any father to send his innocent son todie for the guilty, perverts the meaning of justice. The idea of eternalpunishment hell is meant to constrain by intimidation but it's horriblyunjust.