Analysis of the Play “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell

Killing thousands and thousands of men , the attack went down in history as one of the most horrific events by man in history, and also the day America lost it's innocence....

3. Note the ideas from the history of tragedy 2nd qtr. project that refer to this play.

What sort of public sphere could play such a normative role? Indifferentiated modern societies (that is, societies divided intomultiple economic and social spheres such as markets, a state, civilsociety and so on), one role of the distinctive communication that goeson in the public sphere is to raise topics or express concerns that cutacross social spheres: it not only circulates information about thestate and the economy, but it also establishes a forum for criticism inwhich the boundaries of these spheres are crossed, primarily incitizen's demands for mutual accountability. But the other side of thisgeneralization is a requirement for communication that crosses socialdomains: such a generalization is necessary precisely because thepublic sphere has become less socially and culturally homogeneous andmore internally differentiated than its early modern form (Habermas1989). Instead of appealing to an assumed common norm of“publicity” or a set of culturally specific practices ofcommunication, a cosmopolitan public sphere is created when atleast two culturally rooted public spheres begin to overlap andintersect, as when translations and conferences create a cosmopolitanpublic sphere in various academic disciplines. Instead of relying onthe intrinsic features of the medium to expand communicativeinteraction, networks that are global in scope become publics only withthe development and expansion of transnational civil society. Thecreation of such a civil society is a slow and difficult process thatrequires the highly reflexive forms of communication and boundarycrossing and accountability typical of developed public spheres. On thebasis of their common knowledge of violations of publicity, theirmembers will develop the capacities of public reason to cross andnegotiate boundaries and differences between persons, groups, andcultures.


The Ties That Bind: A Critical Analysis of Wilson’s Fences

13. Outline the action of the play briefly. Why is the action so simple, and the ideas so complex?.

Suppose each day's forecast value is based on the previous day's value so that the weight of each observation drops exponentially the further back (k) in time it is.


The Critical Analysis Essay: An Introduction & Topic …

Democratic norms of freedom can be made explicit in various rights,including civil rights of participation and free expression. Such normsare often violated explicitly in exercises of power for various ends,such as wealth, security, or cultural survival. Besides these explicitrights, such coercion also violates the communicative freedom expressedin ignoring the need to pass decisions through the taking of yes/noattitudes by participants in communication. Habermas calls such speechthat is not dependent on these conditions of communicative rationality“distorted communication.” For example, powerful economic groupshave historically been able to attain their agency goals withoutexplicitly excluding topics from democratic discussion but by impliedthreats and other nondeliberative means (Przworski and Wallerstein1988, 12–29; Bohman 1997, 338–339). Threats of declining investmentsblock redistributive schemes, so that credible threats circumvent theneed to convince others of the reasons for such policies or to put someissue under democratic control. Similarly, biases in agenda settingwithin organizations and institutions limit scope of deliberation andrestrict political communication by defining those topics that can besuccessfully become the subject of public agreement (Bohman 1990). Inthis way, it is easy to see how such a reconstructive approach connectsdirectly to social scientific analyses of the consistency of democraticnorms with actual political behavior.

View Essay - critical+analysis+essay from ENL 3 at UC Davis

Spying on rival players in tennis is not new. Tennis coaches have long sat courtside at practice sessions to try and catch a glimpse of their next opponent or an up and coming player making headlines in the junior ranks. Coaches and players regularly use video to scout opponents technique, tactics and fitness. But Murray’s request for Hawk-Eye to secretly track a training session is perhaps a whole new level of spying that we have not seen in tennis before. Did Murray crossed the line? Are there even rules in place to prevent this?

Random Critical Analysis – Random analysis of stuff …

Nishikori beat Andy Murray at the World Tour Finals in 2014 but Murray was able to turn the result around in Madrid during the clay court season earlier this year. One of the reasons why was because of his serving. In particular his accuracy and depth at important points. Murray also served far fewer second serves at important points in Madrid than he did at the World Tour Finals. If you’re serving short 2nd serves to Nishikori at important points than Nishikori is going to be all over the return and you’ll be playing catch up all point!